Frisky Larr (M. A.)
Radio/Television Journalist/Communication Scientist,
Govt. accredited Translator/Interpreter of the English language
Judicially sworn interpreter of English (Regional Court of Bochum)
Germany
Send your email to:
FriskyLarr@aol.com
One fact is certain
though: the EFCC operative who spoke with the press on Tuesday
April the 22nd of 2008, seems to belong to a camp of
hardliners within the EFCC, whose focus is not necessarily the
challenge of legality and due process but the sheer will to have
anger vented and embarrassment served. Ultimately, these gentlemen
of honor will have to realize pretty fast that they ought to tread
softly in seeking to scratch their skins with the brutality of the
itching felt. They may end up simply having to stop upon seeing
their own blood when the skin is scratched open. They may simply
outsmart themselves running faster than their own legs can take
them, in the frantic attempt to utilize the current momentum
generated by the wind of hate intensely blowing the Obasanjo’s in
the face.
The Iyabo Scandal:
EFCC’s case is weak!! by Frisky Larr
Day-by-day, details are trickling out of
the ‘EFCC versus Iyabo’ scandal currently rocking political
Nollywood in Abuja. In the latest round, it was the EFCC’s turn to
tear its can open and bare up the contents of its own view. What
has thus far, become obvious and comprehensible is that the EFCC
operatives have reasons enough – plenty of it too – to be dead
angry with Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello.
One age-long traditional adage seeking to address the problem of
the human factor in handling matters of public interest says that
scratching the skin in reaction to itching should willfully not
follow the intensity of the itching felt. Else, the skin may be
torn open before the realization of pains while the irritating
itching stimulus allows for a pleasant scratching feel for a
considerable stretch of time.
In practice, this adage says nothing else than cautioning against
conscious or unconscious overreaction in the aftermath of
malicious provocation, for which humans are characteristic in the
quest to assert power and gain edges over their fellow beings. It
therefore goes that public service is a calling that presupposes
some super-human qualities with expectations of the near
impossible.
The issue at stake as reported in the latest media takes, presents
a picture of an EFCC that is vowing to arrest and prosecute
Senator Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello for posing as if she was above the
law and almost ridiculing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission,
come what may. Her attention was said to have been drawn to the
illegality of the N10 million given to her committee by the
Ministry of Health in ample time ahead of the so-called retreat in
far-away Ghana. She is quoted as having agreed to return the money
quietly. For whatever reason there is, she should have reneged on
her words and went ahead to spend the money on the retreat.
No doubt anyone would be aggrieved, as this conduct reflected in
the EFCC’s version of the story is tantamount to questioning the
authority of the anti-graft commission. A position that usually
doesn’t go down well with any African, to say the least of
Nigerians!
An EFCC operative is further quoted to have vented his anger in
the words: “Is it part of the
oversight function of the Senate to go for workshop in Ghana? What
manner of workshop is it that cannot be done in Nigeria?”
The same operative was reported in the
Vanguard daily, to have summed up the issue by reiterating that
Senator Iyabo’s defiance and breach of prior agreement constituted
“a brazen act of disrespect to the anti-graft agency and the
Federal Government.” He continues: “Senator Iyabo Obasanjo
still went ahead, organized some of her colleagues, shared the
money and embarked on the trip to Ghana for the so-called workshop
even after she had been interrogated and told to return the stolen
money.”
It is precisely at this juncture that
common sense is strictly required to prevail as a matter of
priority. While the anti-graft commission is established to
enforce the law, the law is definitely not the EFCC itself nor is
it the persons making up the institution. Many stones that were
thrown Ribadu’s way in advance of his infamous study leave at Kuru
often echoed charges of personalizing the EFCC. He was said to
have overshadowed the cause of the struggle with the charisma of
his personality. It was the fear of the creation of a demi-god
that pervaded the air. Enemies of Ribadu got their way and Ribadu
is not there today.
It therefore, becomes pertinent to ask
if disrespect for the EFCC and the Federal Government is the
financial crime for which Iyabo Obasanjo now deserves to be
arrested and detained. No doubt, this EFCC operative, who wisely
chose to remain anonymous while speaking to the press, would have
been up against an avalanche of internal enemies here and now for
this disastrous public relations blunder.
While it is very much legitimate upon
any citizen of the country, whose money is being sunk down the
drain, to question the rationale behind holding a legislative
retreat, workshop, seminar (whatever they call it) in Ghana, it is
a troubling puzzle for a spokesman and professional operative of
the EFCC to advance this argument in seeking to convince the
public of the need to arrest the embattled senator. When has it
become a financial and economic crime to participate in a workshop
in a foreign country?
While the EFCC now reports that Senator
Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello is required for interrogation and
clarification of ambiguous facts, records also reflect the
intervention of the Presidency in preempting the intended
detention of the senator during her first report for
interrogation, probably in advance of the so-called retreat. The
question should therefore loom on why there is so much desperation
in efforts and commitment to arrest and detain Iyabo
Obasanjo-Bello.
To set the records straight: judging by
the facts allowed in public domain so far, Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello
has a clear case to answer in her capacity as Chairman of the
Senate’s Health Committee. She and her committee did not only fail
to prevail on the Ministry of Health over which they exercise
legislative control function, to return unspent budget money to
the Presidency, they even aided and abetted the illegal
disbursement of such money definitely in breach of laws that
jurisprudents will be precisely able to specify. In her favor
however, no evidence has yet revealed that she embezzled the said
amount. Illegal actions in this respect can therefore be seen to
be in official capacities.
Even though reports are heard, of
grumbles by some members of the Senate Health committee alleging
that they did not benefit from the N10 million spent, it may be
pertinent to probe into their understanding of the word “benefit”.
They may probably be in a position to furnish proof of
embezzlement of the money on the part of senator Iyabo.
So far, no evidence in public domain
supports the EFCC’s anonymous claim that she went ahead “to share
the money” where the vocabularies “spend the money” would have
been more adequate. So far, the upper chamber of the legislative
house has not bared open, its evidences that prompted the issuance
of a clean bill of health.
The pressing question therefore is why
the EFCC is stubbornly focused on Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello as a person
rather than indicting the Health Committee made up of 13 members,
of which 11 were said to have attended the Ghana workshop, and by
implication, the senate directly.
If the EFCC is interested in
prosecuting cases with a touch of professionalism and not with
glimpses of wounded pride and conceitedness, it should come up
with a better focus. It will come to no one as a surprise if the
EFCC loses the case against Iyabo Obasanjo in court. The actual
surprise would be an EFCC-victory on this issue. With a judiciary
that is growing more independent and unpredictable by the day
however, surprises are indeed, no surprises any longer.
One fact is certain though: the EFCC
operative who spoke with the press on Tuesday April the 22nd
of 2008, seems to belong to a camp of hardliners within the EFCC,
whose focus is not necessarily the challenge of legality and due
process but the sheer will to have anger vented and embarrassment
served. Ultimately, these gentlemen of honor will have to realize
pretty fast that they ought to tread softly in seeking to scratch
their skins with the brutality of the itching felt. They may end
up simply having to stop upon seeing their own blood when the skin
is scratched open. They may simply outsmart themselves running
faster than their own legs can take them, in the frantic attempt
to utilize the current momentum generated by the wind of hate
intensely blowing the Obasanjo’s in the face.