In the aftermath of the recent Christmas Day
2009 attempted terrorist attack by Nigerian born Umar
Abdulmutallab over Detroit, Michigan in the United States of
America, one key feature of Nigeria’s now famed confusion in
international diplomacy has again come to the fore:
fire-fighting. In an outburst of outrage and nationalistic
indignation similar to an earlier incident in 2005 when a US
intelligence report on sub-Saharan Africa branded Nigeria a
failing State, with dire consequences for the sub-region, Nigeria
is at it again over this recent incident, with the combined
condemnation of the listing of Nigeria among countries on the US
watch list as a ‘country of interest’ on terrorism by both arms of
the National Assembly. Perhaps due to the long absence of the
President from Nigeria on grounds of ill-health, leading to an
avoidable vacuum at that level of governance, the current umbrage
could not attract a Presidential condemnation, similar to that
issued by former President Olusegun Obasanjo when the US
intelligence report was made public. After all the hue and cry
over the report, it turned out that all the empty threats of
diplomatic rows and the strong request made at the highest
possible level for the US to withdraw the acclaimed offensive
report came to nothing, as the US did no such thing, the report
remains on the books, and the entire umbrage turned out to be, yet
again, hot air from a country which claims to be ‘the giant of
Africa’. In fact, at the end of all the uninformed noise over the
matter, it turned out that the allegedly offensive report was
balanced and fair, and that Nigerian leaders, if they were
thinking correctly for once, would have used the report to the
country’s advantage by ensuring that the scenarios painted in the
said report did not come to pass, through improved governance.
But of course, that was not to be.
The current situation, orchestrated by the
recent cowardly, thoughtless and criminal act by Umar
Abdulmutallab plays back the same scenario five years ago, with
similar disastrous responses from the same National Assembly,
which had jumped into the fray without any form of intellectual
input, with member after member in the ‘hallowed chambers’
berating the United States, and making empty threats, which they
should know better that, neither they, nor Nigeria as a country,
had any means of enforcing. Perhaps more worrisome is the fact
that the current power vacuum at the national level with the
prolonged absence of President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua on medical
grounds, without handing over to his Vice President as dictated by
the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, made any form
of coordinated approach to the incident impossible, with our
quasi- leaders cashing in on an opportunity for stardom, and
crassly missing the point, yet again. Informed watchers of
Nigeria and its challenges of leadership will however not be
overly disappointed at the shallow response of its acclaimed
leaders in times of national crisis, because of the often
questionable pedigree of most of such people, who assume their
positions through dubious elections characterised by thuggery,
rigging and other primitive and desperate tactics in ‘do or die’
electoral contests. The current leadership of the National
Assembly does not inspire any form of confidence in the generality
of Nigerians, beyond their small egos and their perception of
themselves as national leaders, when indeed they are not. One
would have thought that their handling of national affairs during
the current crossroads of our miserable national existence would
be elevated beyond the mundane, but clearly lacking in any form of
intellectual content or a rigorous process that produced them to
their exalted positions, they have carried on in a business as
usual manner, confusing themselves and insulting the psyche of
Nigerians in the process. No wonder the all–important assignment
of amending the Nigerian Constitution, which would benefit the
entire citizens, if done properly, has been marred by reductionist
ego trips over whether the Committee for the review of the
Constitution would have a sole Chairman from the Senate or
co-Chairmen from both chambers. A similar situation played itself
out recently over the rather childish argument between the Senate
President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives over
which chamber the President should address the National Assembly
on the 2010 budget.
For the avoidance of doubt, Nigeria is in no
position to issue ultimatums to any sovereign State, least of all
the United States of America, which undoubtedly is the only
surviving superpower in the world today. Apart from the fact that
Nigeria, which routinely relies on aid from the United States for
survival at critical times, has nothing significant to offer the
US to make her rescind its well thought out policy pronouncements,
even the new found confidence of those at the helm of affairs from
the rising prices of crude oil, Nigeria’s main source of survival,
is fuelled largely by US demand, and the United States can source
its oil demand from any producer of its choice. Moreover,
Nigeria’s contribution to US oil supply per day is so
insignificant that, if that was the source of the ill-advised
boldness by the National Assembly to issue the lame ultimatum,
which was apparently withdrawn in a face-saving press conference
by the Attorney General of the Federation a few days later, any
shortfall from Nigeria in terms of oil will be easily snatched up
by other African countries, like Ghana and Angola, with a much
more stable operating environment.
Finally, one would have expected the National
Assembly and its leaders to focus on the real challenge of
religious fundamentalism and extremism in Nigeria, which clearly
marks Nigeria out as a country which harbours terrorists within
its borders. If not, how else can one describe the orgies of
violence which claims thousands of lives within relatively short
periods over frivolous religious issues, most of which bear no
relevance to domestic issues in Nigeria, such as the killing of
over a thousand innocent people over a cartoon published in a
Danish newspaper a few years ago, which was allegedly
blasphemous? In other countries thought to harbour more religious
extremists, the only reactions the world saw were peaceful
demonstrations, with no loss of life. This is not to mention the
recent killings in Bauchi, the Boko Haram massacres of the
innocents, the Maitasine riots, and several countless orgies, as a
result of which not a single person has ever been held
accountable. What sort of country is this one where people can
kill and maim at will in the name of religion, and nothing is done
about it, and at the end of it all, lame committees are set up,
which never turn in any meaningful reports which are acted upon to
avert similar orgies in the future?
Moreover, Nigeria is probably the only country
in the world where practically anybody can claim its citizenship,
because the possession of a national Passport, the only
internationally recognised evidence of citizenship, can be
purchased by anyone for just N15,000.00, without any efforts being
made to ascertain eligibility, further fuelled by Nigeria’s ever
porous borders.
And in the midst of all these apparent failures, instead of
concentrating their energies on nation building and getting the
job done, the National Assembly and their shallow apologists are
busy issuing ultimatums that can only portray Nigeria as a huge
joke and a laughing stock in the comity of nations.