It is instructive that
the Yoruba people form the arrow-head of criticism against General
Obasanjo. The criticism is strident and sustained. It can be constructive
but can also be down-right malicious. This arises from unique Yoruba
idiosyncrasy: The belief on high principles which have consistently been
the hallmark of Yoruba attitude to all governments in Nigeria regardless
of the individual who heads the government. They are always reluctant to
sacrifice their principles on the alter of political expediency.
My Dictator Is Better Than Yours
by Tunde Adenodi.
Let me re-phrase this
title: A dictator is good as long as he is from my tribe; as long as
he is my dictator! This is the acceptable schism in Nigeria. So, it is
acceptable to have a dictator as long as he is from our side of the
country! The corollary is obvious: Dictators that are not from my
ethnic origin are not acceptable.
Except for the periods
of Balewa and Shagari and part of Obasanjo’s administration in the
early stages, we have always had dictators as our leaders. The
benevolent ones are Gowon and Murtala. The malevolent ones are Buhari,
Babangida and Abacha. Shonekan’s was an illegal government, at least,
so the court ruled. As for Abdusalami Abubakar; if he had as much
opportunity and power to release Abiola or at least reduce his
sentence to house arrest as he did, but chose to preside over the
death of the acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1992 elections, then, a
dictator, he is! General Obasanjo is also moderately benevolent as
well as malevolent. But, a dictator, he is all the same!
This is not to say
that Balewa and Shagari are not to be classified as dictators. The
difference is that they used the courts to back up some of their
dictatorial tendencies. And this probably stems from the fact that
they had no military pedigree in their resume.
The people of the East
have not seen anything wrong with the lopsided coup of Major Nzeogwu
40 years after the event! They have not realized that this single
event has informed the attitude of the Hausa/Fulani to the Igbo and
indeed other ethnic nationalities of the north till today! Nor have
they realized that it is also a major part of the Yoruba attitude
either! And if they have realized it, they have not addressed this
fear of other nationalities to Nzeogwu’s coup of January 1966. Not to
forget the reaction of the people of the Mid-West to the murder of
Festus Okotie-Eboh by Nzeogwu loyalists. So, to the Igbo, Major
Nzeogwu’s coup was good because he was Igbo! Nzeogwu’s dictatorship
was right because he was Igbo. Aguiyi-Ironsi’s dictatorship was also
OK to the Igbo. He could not possibly be wrong! He was adorable
because he was their dictator!
Ojukwu’s heavy-handed
style of administration of the state of Biafra was good to the Igbo
because he was their son. He is not to be questioned as long as he is
their dictator! As despicable as the political activities of Chief
Arthur Nzeribe were and still are, he was considered fit to represent
his constituency of Oguta for many years! And his people voted solidly
for him! But Nigerians, especially of the Yoruba stock, will not
forget him in a hurry!
The north has produced
the greatest number of Nigerian dictators. It is debatable who amongst
the lot can be regarded as the worst of them all. Is it Babangida who
annulled a free and fair election that was conducted under rules set
up by him? Is it Abacha who repressed in a brutal manner all who
protested the annulment? Is it Abdusalami Abubakar who presided over
the death of the acclaimed winner of that election? Or Buhari who
enforced his laws in a selective manner that left a bad–blood in the
polity and commenced the brain-drain and did not even allow any
discussion about civilian participatory democracy?
In any case, the
attitude of “their people” to these dictators is that they can do no
wrong especially while they are in power. And they are not to be
criticized. Criticism is tantamount to subversion and charges of
tribalism and should not be tolerated. Most importantly, the more
their dictator is repressive of Nigerians other than their ethnic
group, the more their support for that leader.
General Babangida is
regarded as the one who dealt a blow to aspirations of other Nigerians
for the highest office of President. For this, his core support base
is the North with a sprinkling of renegade sell-outs from other parts
of the country especially in the South-West. His capacity for mischief
is limitless and he is not short of hangers-on who urge him on. He is
their dictator and therefore can do no wrong!
General Buhari is
running for president. He is the most “popular” among northerners
running even perhaps more popular than his Katsina compatriot-Umar
Yar’Adua. It appears that he had cast on some notable Nigerians the
spell of amnesia. Even the irrepressible Gani Fawehinmi put in a word
in favor of Buhari. Gani had forgotten that Buhari enacted a
retroactive law that caused the execution of the three drug couriers
of 1985. He forgot Buhari’s repression of the press. He had forgotten
the harassment of the academia that set-off a massive brain-drain. He
forgot the selective implementation of the foreign exchange law that
jailed Fela for bringing in his own hard-earned USD5000.00 while
standing guard for an Emir’s 53 suitcases! He also forgot the
one-sided implementation of projects in the north while Buhari was
Chairman of the Petroleum Trust Fund under Abacha. Most importantly,
Gani forgot the greatest danger posed by Buhari’s statement which has
not yet been denied: “that muslims should only vote for muslims”! He
is considered their dictator and must be given another chance to come
back to whip southerners in line as he did during his first time out!
He is loved because he has the charisma necessary to put the rest of
the country in check. He had done it successfully before. He can do it
again. The supporters are now saying IBB was wrong to have removed
Buhari in 1985. He is indeed their dictator.
The one and only time
the north denied the dictators was when it was apparent that the
presidency might elude them in 2007. Then there was this dishonest
argument that the dictators were acting on their own; that they merely
represented themselves but not the interests of their part of the
country; that they were military personnel representing northerners in
the military not representing all northerners.
This argument is
flawed, fundamentally; and is unacceptable. It is unacceptable to
embrace the dictators when they are in office only to turn around and
deny them in difficult times. More importantly is the fact that they,
the northern ruling class, were the ones who installed Obasanjo, not
once, but twice as the president of Nigeria “representing” the Yoruba
people; especially during his second coming. He was imposed on the
Yoruba even when their choice was Olu Falae. If Obasanjo is considered
a representative of his Yoruba ethnic group, then Shagari, IBB, Buhari,
Abacha and the rest of them must by implication be the representative
of their ethnic groups.
The Oba of Yoruba
towns used to exercise a lot of political powers in their domains. But
the Yoruba had ways of protesting against bad decisions of their Oba.
Every year, some nights are set aside for nothing but demonstrations
and protest songs against their Obas. These songs are generally
satirical, but sometimes can be down-right abusive. They are generally
peaceful but sometimes can be violent. Whichever way it turns out,
their Oba never fails to notice the protests. This keeps them abreast
of the opinions of their subjects. And they take appropriate actions
to redress their anger.
It is instructive that
the Yoruba people form the arrow-head of criticism against General
Obasanjo. The criticism is strident and sustained. It can be
constructive but can also be down-right malicious. This arises from
unique Yoruba idiosyncrasy: The belief on high principles which have
consistently been the hallmark of Yoruba attitude to all governments
in Nigeria regardless of the individual who heads the government. They
are always reluctant to sacrifice their principles on the alter of
political expediency. Some examples will prove this point:
MKO Abiola won the
1992 presidential elections fair and square. Babangida annulled it and
put Earnest Shonekan there as puppet Head of State hoping that this
action was enough to placate the Yoruba people. “Not in your life”,
say the Yoruba people. They with-held their support for Shonekan and
worked tirelessly to frustrate his government.
Then Babangida,
through his proxy-Abdusalami Abubakar handed the presidency to
Obasanjo on the platter of gold. No dice! Obasanjo is not Abiola, they
say, and did not
start showing their
support for Obasanjo reluctantly until the 2003 elections. And this
support was conditional. Let us go back several decades earlier.
Earlier, Akintola’s
co-operation with Balewa to frustrate Awolowo was seen as an act of
betrayal. They withheld their support from Akintola’s government. Owo
is perhaps a minority city in Ondo state. But the Ondo people had
voted for Ajasin. So, when Shagari manipulated the results and
declared Omoboriowo the winner in 1983 gubernatorial election, the
people went on the rampage! Shagari had no other choice than to
reinstate Ajasin as the rightful winner of that election.
At the tremendous risk
to his life, Colonel Adekunle Fajuyi literally submitted himself for
execution in the hands of then Major Danjuma and his team when he
insisted he had to go with his guest General JTU Aguiyi-Ironsi. Prior
to this was Alhaji Tafawa Balewa attempt to propitiate the Yoruba
people with his Federal support for Ladoke Akintola renegade
government in Western Region. He even installed his personal
physician- Dr Moses Majekodunmi as the Admininstrator of the West.
They did not support Majekodunmi. The Yoruba people did not buy into
Balewa’s political antics against Obafemi Awolowo. So it is very
un-Yoruba to say that my dictator is better than yours.
Then Babangida,
through his proxy-Abdusalami Abubakar handed the presidency to
Obasanjo on the platter of gold. No dice! Obasanjo is not Abiola, they
say, and did not start showing their support for Obasanjo reluctantly
until the 2003 elections. And this support was conditional.
This is not to say
that the Yoruba had never accepted Obasanjo as their dictator. In the
period leading to the 2003 presidential election, he was reluctantly
accepted as theirs, worthy of being defended. They were to give him
support for his bid for re-election on the condition that he left the
AD in control of the states in their region They did not do this out
of love for Obasanjo. They had seen his support base eroded in the
north as a result of the north’s perception (rightly or wrongly) of
being “marginalized” by the government of Obasanjo. The Yoruba were
not about to let theirs down by competing against him. Not that they
had any chance of winning the presidency if they did. They wanted the
north and indeed the rest of the country to know that a mad man does
have relatives! As a result, the AD did not field any candidate for
president in 2003. But Obasanjo reneged on this deal and routed the AD
from their stronghold declaring PDP the winner in all but one of the
Yoruba states. Then, the undeclared war continued!
The Yoruba are now in
AD, AC, DPP, PDP even when their so-called leader is the president and
leader of the PDP! It is absolutely clear that Obasanjo is NOT their
dictator and in fact, the Yoruba now believes, rightly or wrongly,
that Obasanjo is not capable of doing anything right! This is the
high-point of Yoruba liberalism and I dare say- political development.
A dictator is a
dictator regardless of his ethnic origin. And, no dictator should be
acceptable to anyone! Period.